The classical interpretation of probability deals with events
that are equally likely. We count the number of possible
outcomes, which we will call n, and then say that the
likelihood of event e occurring is 1/n.
What are the of drawing two red cards in a row
from a normal deck of cards?
Let's use our knowledge from the previous material. The
total number of possibilities is 52 choose 2,
while the number of favorable possiblities is 26
choose 2. So the odds are 25 / 102.
Why is it not just 1/2 * 1/2? Because once we have drawn
are red card, there are now fewer red cards in the deck!
Compare to coin flips.
Problem: A company produces cars. For every 12 cars that go out, they inspect three. Only if there is a problem in one of them do they inspect the rest. What is the probability that a lot will go out with a defective car?
If the probability of rolling two sixes in a row is 1/36,
then the odds for succes are the number of outcomes that
result in success (1) versus the number that result in
failure (35). Typically, here we would say, "The odds are
35 to 1 against him."
The basic idea here is that the probability of some event
e is equivalent to the number of times we would expect to
see e if we repeatedly ran some process that sometimes
produces e.
If we repeatedly flip a fair coin, in the long run, we expect
to see a roughly equal number of heads and tails.
This is related to, but not the same as,
The Law of Large Numbers.
The frequentist interpretation says that the probability of
some event simply is its rate of occurence in the long
run, while the Law of Large Numbers relies on there being
something else that is the true probability, and that as our
sample gets larger, we move towards that true probability.
"When something happens just once, the frequency
interpretation lives us no choice but to refer to a set
of similar situations." -- Freund, p. 50
But just what situations are "similar"?
Wikipedia on frequentist propability.
What odds would you accept to bet on event a
occuring as opposed to event b occurring?
"If a person feels that a to b are fair
odds for betting on a success of a given kind, he is, in
fact, assigning to such a success a subjective...
probability:
p = a / (a + b)
Example: If I bet on the Jets winning this weekend
at 3 to 2 odds, I am assigning a 3/5 (60%) chance the Jets
will win.
If I am willing to give odds of 100-to-1, I think the
likelihood of succes is 100 / (100 + 1) (99%). If I give
odds of 1000-to-1, I think likelihood of succes is 1000 /
(1000 + 1) (99.9%).
Axiomatic probability is not an interpretation of probability at all: it deliberately ignores the matter of interpretation and simply tries to set probability theory on a sound axiomatic basis.
"many of the probailities which we use to express our faith in
predictions, judgments, or decisions, are simply 'success
ratios' that apply to the method we have employed. -- Freund,
Introduction to Probability, p. 51